Blog Archives

Bending reality (short version)

Do you believe in magic? Most people don’t. But this isn’t about magic as such – it’s about belief: in particular, Gooch’s Paradox, that “things not only have to be seen to be believed, but also have to be believed to

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Realities, Wyrd and magic

Bending reality

Do you believe in magic? [Yep, this one is long – more than 7000 words, or long even by my somewhat-extreme standards for blogging. But there are good reasons why it needs to be this long, as you’ll discover later – and

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Realities, Wyrd and magic

Starting-friction

Great idea! Let’s get started! Uh… How do we get started? Kind of ‘There’s a hole in my bucket‘, often – everything depends on everything else, so there’s no clear place to start. But since everything does depend on everything else, it’d

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Business, Knowledge, Power and responsibility, Scribbles / writing

Checking the SCORE

What’s a quick, practical alternative to SWOT – one that gives a bit more depth for strategic assessment, yet is still just as fast to use? My answer? Check out the SCORE: Strengths, Challenges, Options, Responses, Effectiveness. What triggered this

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Business, Enterprise architecture, Futures

On stakeholders

Who are our stakeholders? How do we identify our stakeholders? This one came up from the back-and-forth during my ‘Backbone and edge‘ presentation at the IASA UK Summit in London last week. One of the sections in the presentation was about stakeholders

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Business, Enterprise architecture

Migrating from edge to backbone

What should we move between ‘edge’ and ‘backbone’ in our enterprise-architecture? How do we do so? And what governance do we need for this? The core theme behind this here is the notion that ‘agility needs a backbone’ – that

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Business, Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture

How do we make EA make sense?

Those notions of ‘whole-enterprise architecture’ that I’ve been describing in the ‘no-plan Plan‘ series of posts make solid sense to a fair few people – particularly those who’ve some experience of systems-thinking, design-thinking and the like. But it’s painfully clear

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Society

The no-plan ‘Plan’ for whole-enterprise architecture – a summary

That description of ‘the plan that is no plan’, about the direction that I’m moving into after moving out of mainstream ‘enterprise’-architecture, kind of ended up a bit longer than intended. (No surprise there, unfortunately… ) Oh well. In effect,

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Society

The no-plan Plan: people in architecture

Okay, time for the final theme in that ‘no-plan Plan‘ – which somehow seems to be turning into a kind of ‘manifesto for whole-enterprise architecture’ or something like that, for some reason. Oh well. Anyway, this part’s about what is perhaps

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Society

The no-plan Plan: architecture-dynamics

And the next part of that expansion on my ‘no-plan Plan‘ (or ‘manifesto for whole-enterprise architecture’, or whatever it is): this time on the dynamics of architecture. In other words, it’s a focus on how we handle changes to the architecture

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Enterprise architecture, Futures
Books by Tom Graves
Ebooks by Tom Graves
Categories
Archives