Blog Archives

And Australian sexism again…

Does no-one see the danger in this? Apparently not: RT @TJSKane: “@DanielAndrewsMP: no less than 50% of all future appointments to all paid government boards, & all Victorian courts, will be women”Onya Dan No doubt many people would think of

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Futures, Power and responsibility, Society

Tools and metatools

Meta-this-that-and-the-other – metamodels, metaframeworks, metamethodology, metatheory, even metatools? What is all this stuff about ‘meta-‘? And what is ‘meta-’, anyway? One answer is that it’s about a kind of recursion that we often need in our work, in which something is applied to

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

More on theory and metatheory in EA

“Yes, we need theory in enterprise-architecture”, people will often say to me, “but which theory should it be? Should it be quantitative, everything defined in terms of metrics? Or should it be qualitative, and forget about metrics entirely? Which one

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture

Theory and metatheory in enterprise-architecture

What’s the role of theory in enterprise-architecture? Could there be such as thing as ‘the theory of enterprise-architecture’? Can we use that theory, for example, to separate useful EA models from useless ones? It seems that Nick Malik thinks so, as per

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture

Declaring the assumptions

Moving onward with this exploration of how I’m reframing the way I work, a key part is around identifying the constraints of that work: where and how the tools work, and – perhaps even more important – being clear about

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

On (not) changing the world

Back on the ‘no more arguments‘ theme, there were a couple of responses I received that, although nominally private, were so apposite and to-the-point that I really do need to reprise them here. (Because the messages were private, I’ll paraphrase them

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Power and responsibility, Society, The Outsider

Reframing the way I work

It’s time to make an end to the arguments that have plagued my professional-life and more for at least the past decade. And the simplest way to do that – to make that ending possible – is to reframe what

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

An end to the arguments

It’s sometimes said that the real collective-noun for architects is an argument – ‘an argument of architects’. We see that often enough on LinkedIn, to be sure… Yet we’ve also seen it way too often on these pages here, or in

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

Taking a break

The run-up to winter-solstice seems always a bad time for me, as can be seen all too clearly on this blog, over the respective years. Something about the gathering dark, I suspect… Be that as it may, it really is time

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Business, Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

Calling a halt

Enterprise-architecture is a mess. And I’m not the one to fix it. That’s become all too clear to me right now – particularly after the farrago around that previous couple of posts about specialism-trolling, and the almost total non-response to that pair of

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Business, Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures
Books by Tom Graves
Ebooks by Tom Graves
Categories
Archives