Blog Archives

More on the ‘Why’ for new toolsets

As you may have noticed, I’ve been kinda struggling somewhat to fully explain the ‘Why’ behind all of this talk of ‘new toolsets for enterprise-architecture‘ and related disciplines. And then, out of the blue, via a reTweet from Phil Beauvoir

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Knowledge

From tools to toolset

Okay, I’ll admit to a certain amount of frustration here… Yes, I’ve been talking a lot about toolsets for enterprise-architecture and the like, the ‘Why’ for a new type of toolset, the workflows within which such toolsets would appear and

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Knowledge

Toolsets for associative modelling

Back on the toolsets theme, what’s the Why behind all this focus on a new type of toolset? Why won’t the existing toolsets do the job? In practice, the core concern is as per the previous post ‘Toolsets, pinball and un-dotting

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Knowledge

Tools and metatools

Meta-this-that-and-the-other – metamodels, metaframeworks, metamethodology, metatheory, even metatools? What is all this stuff about ‘meta-‘? And what is ‘meta-’, anyway? One answer is that it’s about a kind of recursion that we often need in our work, in which something is applied to

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

Declaring the assumptions

Moving onward with this exploration of how I’m reframing the way I work, a key part is around identifying the constraints of that work: where and how the tools work, and – perhaps even more important – being clear about

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

On (not) changing the world

Back on the ‘no more arguments‘ theme, there were a couple of responses I received that, although nominally private, were so apposite and to-the-point that I really do need to reprise them here. (Because the messages were private, I’ll paraphrase them

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Power and responsibility, Society, The Outsider

Reframing the way I work

It’s time to make an end to the arguments that have plagued my professional-life and more for at least the past decade. And the simplest way to do that – to make that ending possible – is to reframe what

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

An end to the arguments

It’s sometimes said that the real collective-noun for architects is an argument – ‘an argument of architects’. We see that often enough on LinkedIn, to be sure… Yet we’ve also seen it way too often on these pages here, or in

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

Taking a break

The run-up to winter-solstice seems always a bad time for me, as can be seen all too clearly on this blog, over the respective years. Something about the gathering dark, I suspect… Be that as it may, it really is time

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Business, Complexity / Structure, Enterprise architecture, Futures, Knowledge

The point of specialism

What’s the point of specialism? Or, perhaps more to the point, why do we so much argue about ‘the point’? – is it a side-effect of specialism itself? After the farrago around the last couple of posts here, this is perhaps best described

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Enterprise architecture, Knowledge
Books by Tom Graves
Ebooks by Tom Graves
Categories
Archives